If americans ate fewer foods with suger and salt, their general health_________better. ?
Explanation
In English, when forming conditional sentences that express unreal or unlikely situations, we typically use the second conditional form. This involves using "would" in the main clause to indicate the possible outcome of the hypothetical scenario laid out in the "if" clause.
The correct completion with "would be" (option B) indicates that if the condition of eating fewer sugary and salty foods is met, then the expected outcome is an improvement in general health. The other options do not fit grammatically or contextually; "is" (A) suggests a certainty that does not align with the hypothetical scenario, "be" (C) is incorrect because it lacks a modal verb to express the conditionality, and "will be" (D) suggests a future certainty rather than a hypothetical outcome. Thus, "would be" is the correct choice, effectively conveying the idea that better health is a potential result contingent on the behavior change.
Related Questions
She hardly ever eats ________ potatoes.
Any candidate caught ______ in the examination will be disqualified.
He wonât be able to drive his car unless he ________ his license.
There is only one kind of species of snake ______ poisonous in Turkey.
He _____ to a senior designer.
Driving should _____ in city centers.
__ we get on well together. She likes staying at home in the evening __
⧍ āĻāϰ āĻāϤ āĻļāϤāĻžāĻāĻļ ā§Ž āĻšāĻŦā§?
John is eating too much. ______.
I hope everyone in your family is ________ good health