đź“… Created: 07 Nov, 2024
🔄 Updated: 23 Aug, 2025

No animal "has yet been" discovered that can "see" "infrared light" with "its" eyes. "No error" (Choice that contains an error) ?

Explanation

The question presents a statement about animals that have not been discovered to see infrared light with their eyes. The phrase "has yet been" is grammatically incorrect in this context. The proper wording should be "have yet to be" since "animal" is singular, but the phrase refers to an indefinite number of animals (no animal...). Thus, the correct phrasing connects to the idea that no addition of discoveries regarding any animals capable of seeing such light has been made.

To clarify, the construction "has yet been" implies a singular subject and suggests that we are discussing one animal's discovery. Instead, the phrase must correctly convey that in the realm of animal species, none are known to have this capability. The correct expression emphasizes the continuous absence of discovery in a broader context.

Remember the key terms to retain the essence of the correction: "has yet been" vs. "have yet to be," and the overall idea of no animals having been found that see infrared light an important distinction in grammatical structure that impacts clarity.